REDONDO BEACH, CA Zoning Board of Adjustment
Sundays tracks every public Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting in REDONDO BEACH, CA and summarizes what was decided — variances, site-plan and subdivision applications, and Board of Adjustment hearings. Land-use items are kept off the weekly Sundays email (they're a specialist read), but every one is archived here and verified against the official meeting record. 35 items on file; most recent October 17, 2026.
-
Continue Public Hearing and Direct Staff to Revise Ordinance to Use AUP Process; Continue Item to Next Meeting
The Council directed staff to revise the proposed coastal zone ordinance to use an administrative use permit process instead of a conditional use permit and continued the public hearing to the next Council meeting.
-
Public Comment: Permit Process for Service Station General Food Sales (CUP vs AUP)
Two speakers opposed changing from a conditional use permit to an administrative use permit, arguing it would remove a layer of public input and concentrate decision-making power.
-
Public Participation – Non-Agenda Items (opening public comment)
One speaker addressed non-agenda issues, criticizing the shift from Conditional Use Permits to Administrative Use Permits and arguing it reduces public participation and increases costs and impacts on neighbors.
-
Grant appeal and approve variance for four cryogenic tanks (approx. 38 ft) at 2477 Manhattan Beach Boulevard; added landscaping condition direction
Council granted the appeal and approved the variance to exceed the 30-foot height limit for four bulk cryogenic storage tanks at an existing manufacturing facility, adopting Resolution No. CC-2610-083. The motion included direction to work with staff on maximizing trees along the Manhattan Beach Boulevard corridor/frontage as a condition.
-
Close public hearing (Impulse Space variance appeal)
After returning from recess, Council closed the public hearing on the Impulse Space variance appeal.
-
Public hearing public comment: Impulse Space variance appeal (support and opposition)
Residents and community members provided extensive comment on the Impulse Space variance appeal, with supporters emphasizing economic development and the limited nature of an 8-foot height difference, and opponents emphasizing variance legal standards, neighborhood compatibility, aesthetics, property values, and safety concerns related to cryogenic tanks near residences.
-
Appellant presentation: Impulse Space request to overturn denial and approve 8-foot height variance
Impulse Space presented its case to overturn the Planning Commission denial, describing company operations, need for liquid nitrogen and argon, site constraints, alternatives considered, and alignment with general plan economic development goals; the company stated it would work with the City on landscaping/screening.
-
Staff report: Impulse Space variance appeal and permitting process overview
Community Development staff presented the Impulse Space variance appeal, describing the site, requested 8-foot height increase, Planning Commission history, and the building/fire/CUPA permitting process; staff recommended granting the appeal and approving the variance via an updated draft resolution.
-
Public hearing opened: appeal of Planning Commission denial of variance for Impulse Space cryogenic tanks (38 ft vs 30 ft height limit)
Council opened the public hearing on the Impulse Space appeal regarding a variance to exceed the 30-foot height limit for four bulk cryogenic storage tanks at 2477 Manhattan Beach Boulevard, and the Mayor outlined the appeal process and variance findings criteria.
-
Public participation — non-agenda items (multiple topics)
Multiple residents provided non-agenda public comment on code enforcement and safety issues (sightline hedge and illegal mirror; trash bins and fire access), concerns about Marine Mammal Care Center negotiations, and a neighbor’s request for information on an ADU project setback and construction status; one speaker offered general appreciation for council and staff.
-
Receipt and filing of blue folder items
Council received and filed the blue folder items, which included J1 public participation, L1 public hearing on an Impulse Space variance appeal, and N2 election-related resolutions and contracts.
-
Public hearing public comment: variance for 38-foot cryogenic tanks near residential neighborhood (Impulse Space)
Multiple residents and one online commenter opposed the requested variance for four 38-foot cryogenic tanks, citing compatibility with adjacent homes, safety/asphyxiation risks, aesthetics, property values, notice/outreach concerns, and alleged errors in staff documents. Speakers urged denial or continuation; no speakers in support were recorded.
-
Variance request for four bulk cryogenic storage tanks at 2477 Manhattan Beach Boulevard (Impulse Space) — initial approval motion failed; subsequent denial resolution adopted
The Commission considered a variance to exceed the 30-foot height limit in the IC1 zone for four cryogenic tanks proposed at an aerospace manufacturing facility. After staff and applicant presentations and extensive public comment opposing the variance, an approval motion failed on roll call. The Commission then adopted Resolution 20269-PCR11 denying the variance with revised findings.
-
Introduction: potential municipal code updates to streamline business permitting and land use regulations
Community Development staff presented an overview of business permitting pathways (permit-by-right, conditional use permit, administrative use permit) and identified potential code changes to reduce barriers to opening businesses. Council directed use of the economic development subcommittee to refine recommendations and voted to receive and file.
-
Commission Discussion — Whether to Decide J1 or Continue for Additional Outreach/Information
Commissioners debated whether to approve the height variance or continue the item. Discussion focused on the narrow scope of a height variance versus broader safety concerns, errors in the staff report (oxygen reference), adequacy of outreach and application materials, and whether additional time would help address public concerns.
-
Public Hearing Testimony — J1 Cryogenic Tanks Variance (Clustered Summary of Speakers)
Speakers living near the site opposed or sought continuation of the J1 variance, citing safety risks (oxygen displacement, potential rupture), traffic and evacuation concerns near the 405 corridor, cumulative noise and light impacts with Northrop Grumman, and deficiencies in the application and staff report (including an oxygen reference).
-
Fire Department Comments and Commissioner Questions — J1 Cryogenic Tanks Height Variance
The fire department stated the height variance did not diminish fire code requirements and that the project would undergo plan check and inspections, including hazardous materials inspections. Commissioners asked about pressure, explosion potential, leak impacts, evacuation distances, proximity to homes, and comparisons to other facilities.
-
Staff Presentation — J1 Variance Request for Four 38-Foot Cryogenic Storage Tanks (Impulse Space)
Planning staff presented the J1 request for a variance to allow four approximately 38-foot cryogenic storage tanks at 2477 Manhattan Beach Boulevard. Staff described the site, setbacks, tank contents, safety features, delivery frequency, and the findings supporting approval of the variance.
-
Open Public Hearing — J1 Variance for Cryogenic Storage Tanks at 2477 Manhattan Beach Boulevard (Impulse Space)
The commission opened the public hearing for agenda item J1 regarding an exemption declaration and a variance to exceed the 30-foot height limit for cryogenic storage tanks at Impulse Space’s facility.
-
Second reading adoption: General Plan Land Use Element implementing ordinance and Coastal Land Use Plan implementing ordinance; debate over recitals referencing PI/FAR and BCHD
Council considered item H5, which included second reading adoption of two ordinances (CC-3314-26 and CC-3315-26) implementing updates to the General Plan Land Use Element and Coastal Land Use Plan. Discussion focused on recitals referencing PI land use and a 1.25 FAR, with public commenters urging removal of BCHD-related language and others defending the record.
-
Public hearing comment: support for 1.5 FAR; concerns about ordinance consistency, height, and driveway standards
A resident supported increasing FAR to 1.5 in the AAAP but raised concerns about inconsistencies between the land use element and zoning ordinance naming, suggested keeping height limits closer to 30–36 feet, and urged returning a driveway ordinance update to Council to reduce driveway widths and impervious footprint.
-
Staff presentation: updated land use element adoption and implementing zoning ordinance amendments; local coastal program addendum EIR
Staff presented the updated land use element and implementing zoning ordinance amendments, describing a 10-year process, special policy areas, FAR limits, and changes along the Artesia Aviation Corridor Area Plan (AAAP), including rooftop dining and development standards.
-
Public participation on non-agenda items (multiple topics)
The Council held a non-agenda public comment period. Speakers addressed hedge/sightline code enforcement and process, Beach Cities Health District (BCHD) issues including FAR and senior facility operators, HOA/ADU permitting and public records requests, renter affordability and tenant protections, City budget deficits, and a harbor fundraising event.
-
Approval – Variances and Exemption Declaration for 2606 Green Lane
The Commission approved the requested variances and exemption declaration for the 2606 Green Lane project (case referenced as J2PC260642). Commissioners discussed the substandard lot context and the limited nature of new encroachments before voting.
-
Public Comment – Item J2 (2606 Green Lane Variances)
Public comment was taken on the 2606 Green Lane variance request. The applicant’s representatives stated the owner has lived there for 40 years and intends to return after remodeling; another speaker said the remodel is to accommodate a retired twin sister and create two master bedrooms.
-
Staff Presentation and Commission Questions – Variances for 2606 Green Lane
Staff presented the 2606 Green Lane project and four requested variances. Commissioners questioned the extent of new encroachments, second-floor elements, neighbor comments, and how attic space would be treated as habitable space.
-
Public Hearing Opened – Variance Request for 2606 Green Lane (Front/Side/Rear Setbacks and Outdoor Living Space)
The Commission opened the public hearing for item J2 regarding a variance request for reduced front, side, and rear yard setbacks and reduced outdoor living space for additions to an existing single-family residence at 2606 Green Lane in the R2 zone.
-
Adopt resolution approving exemption declaration and conditional use permit for Fit Kids Gymnastics Center (2605 Manhattan Beach Boulevard)
The commission adopted a resolution approving an exemption declaration and conditional use permit for Fit Kids Gymnastics Center in an existing 18,168 square foot industrial space at 2605 Manhattan Beach Boulevard (IC-1 zone), Case No. 20260288.
-
Public comment on Item J1: Support for Fit Kids Gymnastics Center expansion and CUP
One community member spoke in support of approving the conditional use permit, citing the program’s positive impact on children and the community and urging approval to allow the facility’s expansion.
-
Staff presentation: Fit Kids Gymnastics Center conditional use permit and exemption declaration
The senior planner presented the project location, business operations, hours, parking analysis, and noise considerations for Fit Kids Gymnastics Center’s relocation and expansion within the West Bay Business Park.
-
Open public hearing: Conditional use permit for Fit Kids Gymnastics Center at 2605 Manhattan Beach Boulevard
The commission opened the public hearing for Item J1 regarding an exemption declaration and conditional use permit for Fit Kids Gymnastics Center in an existing industrial space at 2605 Manhattan Beach Boulevard.
-
Approval of Conditional Use Permit for Dog Daycare and Training Facility
The Planning Commission reviewed and approved a conditional use permit for a dog daycare and training facility at 1212 South Pacific Coast Highway. Discussions focused on parking, noise mitigation, waste management, and operational guidelines, ensuring compliance with zoning and noise ordinances while addressing community concerns.
-
Approval of Conditional Use Permit for Dog Daycare and Training Facility
The Redondo Beach Planning Commission reviewed and approved a resolution permitting the operation of a dog daycare and training facility at 1212 South Pacific Coast Highway. The facility will include daycare, training, and overnight boarding for dogs with capacity limits and strict operational guidelines to mitigate noise, odor, and parking concerns.
-
Conditional Use Permit for Dog Daycare and Training Facility
The ordinance discusses the approval of a conditional use permit for a dog daycare and training facility located at 1212 South Pacific Coast Highway in Redondo Beach, CA. Key considerations include parking, noise mitigation, waste management, and operational hours to ensure community compatibility and adherence to city regulations.
-
Approval of Dog Daycare Conditional Use Permit
The Planning Commission unanimously approved the conditional use permit for the dog daycare and training facility, affirming compliance with city regulations.